翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ United Front of Mozambique
・ United Front of Political Parties and Civic Associations
・ United Front of Principlists
・ United Front Party (Ghana)
・ United Front Work Department
・ United Fronts
・ United Fruit Company
・ United Furniture Warehouse
・ United Furniture Workers of America
・ United Future
・ United Future (disambiguation)
・ United Future Organization
・ United Garment Workers of America
・ United Garment Workers' Trade Union
・ United Gas Corporation
United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Ideal Cement Co.
・ United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, Gas, & Water Division
・ United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.
・ United Gates of America
・ United General Workers Union
・ United German Hungarians of Philadelphia and Vicinity
・ United Ghana Movement
・ United Ghettos of America
・ United Ghettos of America Vol. 2
・ United Givers Fund
・ United Goans Democratic Party
・ United Goans Party
・ United Gold Coast Convention
・ United Golf Association
・ United Gospel Tabernacles


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Ideal Cement Co. : ウィキペディア英語版
United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Ideal Cement Co.

''United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Ideal Cement Co.'', , is a United States Supreme Court case which vacated a lower appellate court decision, holding that federal courts should abstain from ruling on the constitutionality of a state tax issue that state courts should determine.
==Background==
The United Gas Pipe Line Company operates three interstate natural gas pipelines that connect to a station located in Mobile, Alabama, where the gas is reduced in pressure and is distributed using a system operated by the Mobile Gas Service Corporation. United Gas had contracts to provide gas to two industrial facilities owned by the Ideal Cement Company and the Scott Paper Company, each with clauses that the customer would reimburse United Gas for any taxes it paid for providing gas. The City of Mobile has an ordinance requiring a license to conduct a business for the sale of natural gas within the city involving a payment of 1.5% of gross receipts. United Gas, which is incorporated in Delaware, reimbursed Mobile Gas for the amount it paid to the city for the gas deliveries made to Ideal Cement and Scott Paper, and then filed suit in federal court based upon diversity jurisdiction for recovery of that amount from Ideal Cement and Scott Paper. At issue in the case was whether the city license represented a tax and whether it constituted a precondition to conduct interstate trade in violation of the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The federal district court granted summary judgment in favor of United Gas based upon the tax provision of the contracts, but the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the district court based upon the constitutional issue. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Ideal Cement Co.」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.